First person
- Rath Darkblade
- Moderator
- Posts: 2633
- Joined: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 4:39 pm
- Location: Melbourne, VIC
Re: First person
Hmm... I've watched some of this, and decided it's not for me. Why? Because first-person is:
a) For psychological thrillers, with lots of introspection or internal monologue;
OR
b) Only one character's journey is central to the narrative.
Well, I just don't write those sort of stories.
My protag's journey takes precedence, true, but I have many characters, and choose to write from the POV of at least two, because:
1. Sometimes my protag is out for the count - injured, or sleeping. Who takes POV? Someone else. (If you remember the Stephen the Barbarian story, this happens when someone else - I won't spoil it by saying who - takes the night watch).
2. Sometimes I wish to show what is happening with the protag's True Love(TM).
This also happens in the "Stephen the Barbarian" story: I give his True Love(TM) at least 2-3 chapters to shine on her own. I also do it with other stories.
I simply think it's unfair: why should the protag have all the fun?
a) For psychological thrillers, with lots of introspection or internal monologue;
OR
b) Only one character's journey is central to the narrative.
Well, I just don't write those sort of stories.
1. Sometimes my protag is out for the count - injured, or sleeping. Who takes POV? Someone else. (If you remember the Stephen the Barbarian story, this happens when someone else - I won't spoil it by saying who - takes the night watch).
2. Sometimes I wish to show what is happening with the protag's True Love(TM).
I simply think it's unfair: why should the protag have all the fun?
There is nothing wrong with nepotism, so long as you keep it all in the family. (Winston Churchill)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
