Enzed wrote:The past incident does relate to this person who has now been removed. There is reason to believe they are the same person.
Spot on. This member and BettyBoop_71 / MazzaE are one and the same person.
Enzed wrote:The past incident does relate to this person who has now been removed. There is reason to believe they are the same person.
A lot more to this than what you (and other members) know about
Rule number 8. Forum administrators may deny any member access to this site at any time, should they see fit
Terence Charles wrote:I am still not happy with the way in which this action was taken.
PGB states,A lot more to this than what you (and other members) know about
Personally I feel that as most members of this Forum seem to be adults then why do we need to be 'protected from the details'' Surely if an action like this is considered then the members should be forewarned, and an explanation forthcoming. I personally do not need any protection, and I consider myself reasonable enough to assess information accurately.
Terence Charles wrote:Imunch seemed to have a totally different agenda to the previous people you have identified him/he withr. Imunch made general derogatory statements, they weren't directed at any individual. Personally I was amused by the statements and interested to know why they were being made. I think Imunch was trying to provoke a reaction from us. Now we'll never know why. Are we quite sure that this is the same individual as BettyBoop etc. If so then why isn't the individual identified on the forum. Are we being protected again.
Terence Charles wrote:PGB quotesRule number 8. Forum administrators may deny any member access to this site at any time, should they see fit
I read Rule number 8 as saying a Moderator NOT Administrator has these powers.. An interesting typo!
Terence Charles wrote:Indeed this seems to be the main function of Moderators on the Forum, dealing with unruly members and assisting those that need it. Why weren't the moderators more involved with this individual if desperate action was needed.
Terence Charles wrote:If Imunch was BettyBoop et al, then this type of thing could be repeated and repeated with spurious memberships forming and being banned. Not a good thing for the forum. I believe that the BettyBoop types wither when the light of information shines on them.
Terence Charles wrote:PGB I do get concerned when someone seems to be becoming obsessed with 'banning' things, or taking dramatic negative actions. It was only a short time ago that you twice advocated removing memberships and of closing the Forum down completely. I think you should talk with the administration team more often. Let's get a positive and adult attitudes towards this forum, it's for writers not pre-schoolers in the sandpit.
I am not sure where you are seeing this. Below is the full text of what every member agreed to BEFORE they joined up.
an administrator is ABOVE a moderator
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest