Removal of non-active accounts

[wolfwriter]

so far I think we're agreeing?

[AJ Konlucko]

So we leave it as it is and don't remove inactive members?

[Rkcapps]

Makes sense. Some of us may never have found here if AWF hadn't shown up on a search engine. I like things tidy and reflective of the true status but, in this instance, I can see the benefit of a fellow writer finding us, for that writer - we should keep that possibility alive and if that means keeping inactive members, so be it.

[wolfwriter]

to be honest, who really cares how many inactive members we have. I didn't even know until it was said in this thread. It wouldn't have stopped me joining and I still don't care now. All I cared about was that it was australian, amercians would be no use to me.

[AJ Konlucko]

to be honest, who really cares how many inactive members we have. I didn't even know until it was said in this thread. It wouldn't have stopped me joining and I still don't care now. All I cared about was that it was australian, amercians would be no use to me.

Thank you for your input. Based on this and the other comments I will be leaving things as they are.

[wolfwriter]

[Enzed]

to be honest, who really cares how many inactive members we have. I didn't even know until it was said in this thread. It wouldn't have stopped me joining and I still don't care now. All I cared about was that it was australian, amercians would be no use to me.

Thank you for your input. Based on this and the other comments I will be leaving things as they are.

Well, if it ain't broke it doesn't need fixing.

[AJ Konlucko]

What about members who have been signed up for over a year but have never posted?

[Rkcapps]

That's ok, they may return one day...

[Peter McLennan]

Paul, I like your style.